Native Title has had its greatest impact in regional Australia, in particular on the mining and pastoral industries. The High Court's decision in the Wik case that native title and pastoral leases can coexist has increased the uncertainty about the extent of native title in Australia. During the election campaign the Government gave a commitment to retaining the Native Title Act 1993 (the NTA) but reserved the right to propose amendments to ensure its workability while respecting the provisions of the Racial Discrimination Act 1975. To this end, the Government introduced amendments to the NTA into Parliament in June 1996, and released an Exposure Draft of amendments on the right to negotiate and representative Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander bodies in October 1996.
Difficulties with the Act
These proposed amendments, which were developed before the Wik decision, are intended to overcome many of the operational difficulties currently being experienced by those who have to work with the Act and the lack of real results. By way of example, as at 22 April 1997 there had been 510 claimant applications lodged for a determination of native title and only one determination of native title made. The amendments reflect a balance between the continued recognition and protection of native title and the economic development of the nation.
In brief, the amendments proposed in 1996:
These proposed amendments also strengthen the responsibilities of the representative bodies by establishing a statutory framework which will improve their accountability and consistency of performance. These amendments had not been passed when the Wik decision was announced, and have been put on hold while the Government considers its response to that decision. The Government may revisit some of the 1996 proposed amendments in the course of delivering its response to the Wik decision.
The Wik decision has overturned one of the fundamental assumptions of governments when the legislation was passed: that the grant of a valid lease extinguished native title. The implications of this change have a major impact on the operation of the Act and may also affect the day-to-day operation of the pastoral and mining industries as well as State and Territory land management.
Detailed consultations have been held with all interests affected by the Wik decision, including Premiers and Chief Ministers, mining and pastoral industry representatives and indigenous leaders. The Government remains committed to its policy of producing a resolution that is fair to industry, respects native title and which promotes the national interest.
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note: Figures in the table are rounded.
* These decisions were announced prior to the 1997-98 Budget