The Commonwealth Budget 2000-2001
Home | Search | Site Map | Help

Previous PageTable Of ContentsNext Page

Mid-Year Economic and Fiscal Outlook 2000-01

horizontal line

horizontal line

The Commonwealth's fiscal outlook has strengthened since the 2000-01 Budget. The expected underlying cash surplus for 2000-01 has increased by $1.5 billion to $4.3 billion, with a revised fiscal surplus of $8.4 billion.

As shown in Table 5, the budget is expected to remain in surplus throughout the forward estimates period.

Table 5: Commonwealth general government budget aggregates(a)

Table 6 provides a reconciliation of the fiscal balance estimates between the 2000-01 Budget and the 2000-01 MYEFO. It shows that the fiscal surplus projected for 2000-01 has been revised upwards by $3.0 billion since Budget. This improvement is partly due to parameter variations - with an increase in expected revenue from stronger economic and employment growth only partly offset by increased expenses. Total new policy decisions since Budget have reduced the expected surplus in 2000-01 by $509 million.

Table 6: Reconciliation of 2000-01 Budget and MYEFO fiscal balance estimates

Estimated total general government revenue has increased in 2000-01 and all forward years since Budget. In 2000-01, total revenue is expected to be $4.2 billion (2.7 per cent) higher than estimated at the time of the 2000-01 Budget, with less substantial revenue gains in the forward years.

The increase in estimated revenue in 2000-01 is largely due to upward revisions to forecast nominal GDP and employment growth, and some ongoing base effects of a stronger than expected revenue outcome for 1999-20001. Policy decisions taken since the 2000-01 Budget are also expected to increase revenue in 2000-01, but reduce revenue in the forward years.

The major revisions to expected revenue in 2000-01 include:

These expected increases in revenue are partially offset by:

Further detail on the revised revenue estimates is provided in Part IV.

As noted above, the impact on the projected fiscal surplus of higher than anticipated revenue in 2000-01 is partially offset by an upward revision to estimated expenses. The upward revision to expenses is primarily due to programme specific parameter variations, with policy decisions since Budget adding around $596 million to expenses in 2000-01.

The major parameter driven increases in expected expenses for 2000-01 include:

These upward variations are partially offset by an anticipated reduction in budget balancing assistance payments to the States and Territories as a result of higher than expected GST collections in 2000-01. As described in Box 1, previously unidentified transitional factors are expected to produce a one-off increase in net GST revenue of $2.25 billion in 2000-01. This additional GST revenue is expected to reduce budget balancing assistance grants to the States and Territories in 2000-01 and 2001-02.

An additional offsetting reduction in expenses of around $96 million in 2000-01 (increasing to around $145 million in 2003-04) is due to a downward revision in the estimated number of unemployment benefit recipients.

Pending finalisation of the Government's Defence White Paper, provision has been made in the Contingency Reserve for a change in defence expenses in 2001-02 and the forward years.

More detailed information on expenses and net capital investment can be found in Part V. Expense policy measures are individually described in Appendix A.

Box 1: The revised outlook for GST collections and budget balancing assistance payments to the States

With the introduction of The New Tax System, the Commonwealth has provided an undertaking to ensure that the States and Territories are not financially disadvantaged relative to previous funding arrangements. During the transition period, this undertaking is met by the Commonwealth providing budget balancing assistance (BBA) payments to the States.

The amount of BBA to be paid by the Commonwealth is determined by the difference between GST revenue received by the States and a guaranteed minimum amount (GMA). In turn, the GMA includes estimated revenues forgone by the States as well as additional expenses incurred by the States.

Because GST revenue is paid to the States, a change in GST revenue does not directly affect the Commonwealth's budget surplus. However, during the transition period, it indirectly affects the Commonwealth budget through variations to BBA.

At this stage, the first quarterly GST return has not been fully completed and future projections are subject to much greater uncertainty than is the case with other revenue collections. However, early GST collections have revealed some previously unidentified transitional factors that will tend to boost net GST revenue in 2000-01 only. These factors include:

  • a short lag between when businesses report GST receipts on sales and when they claim input tax credits relating to those sales. A short invoice processing lag in claiming input tax credits means slower than expected initial claims sufficient to produce a one-off significant boost to net GST collections in 2000-01; and

  • the time between the receipt of GST revenue and the processing of net refunds by the ATO means that some refunds are expected to slip from 2000-01 to early 2001-02 - boosting net GST collections in the current year.

Transitional effects are expected to produce a one-off increase in net GST revenue of $2.25 billion in 2000-01. Estimated GST revenue is unchanged in the forward years.

Table 7 summarises the expected impact of higher anticipated GST collections and revised GMA estimates on the Commonwealth's budget surplus. The dominant influence is the increase in GST revenue in 2000-01. Together with expected revisions to the GMA (as a result of parameter changes and increased ATO administration costs), the increase in GST is expected to reduce BBA grants to the States by $360 million in 2000-01 and by $1,339 million in 2001-02.

    continued

Table 7: Changes in expected GST revenue and BBA payments

Table 7: Changes in expected GST revenue and BBA payments

What is the budget effect in 2000-01 and 2001-02?

Table 7 shows that the expected increase in GST revenue in 2000-01 means the States are not expected to require a loan or as much by way of grants under BBA. Because loan repayment is a cost component built into the GMA in 2001-02, the GMA is reduced and BBA is reduced accordingly with positive implications for both the fiscal and underlying cash balances in that year.

Chart 2: Fiscal and underlying cash balances

In 2000-01, Commonwealth general government net debt is estimated to fall to its lowest level as a percentage of GDP since 1990-91. Net debt is forecast to continue falling through the forward estimates period and is projected to be eliminated by 2003-04. Net debt has fallen from a high of almost 20 per cent of GDP in 1995-96 to an expected 6.4 per cent in 2000-01 - a net reduction of over $50 billion.

Table 8: Commonwealth general government net worth and net debt ($b)

Table 8: Commonwealth general government net worth and net debt

In 2000-01, Commonwealth general government GFS net worth is estimated to improve by a further $9.8 billion compared with the 2000-01 Budget estimate. The changes in estimated net worth since Budget are primarily due to two partially offsetting classification changes: the removal of defence weapons platforms from the balance sheet (see Box 2 in Part V) and the move to value Commonwealth investments in public corporations at market value instead of historic cost (see Box 1 of the 1999-2000 Final Budget Outcome).

Chart 4: Commonwealth general government net debt

Chart 5: Commonwealth general government assests and liabilities

In 2000-01, the underlying cash balance is expected to be in surplus by $4.3 billion, around $1.5 billion higher than the corresponding estimate at the 2000-01 Budget.

Table 9: Summary of Commonwealth general government cash flows ($b)

Many of the variations to accrual revenue, expenses and net capital investment since the 2000-01 Budget (described earlier in this Part) also explain the changes in the underlying cash balance. However, some variations have different impacts on the cash and accrual budget aggregates. This accounts for the different magnitude of changes in the underlying cash balance and the fiscal balance since the 2000-01 Budget.

Major variations that contribute to this difference include:



1 The final outcome for total revenue in 1999-2000 was around $2 billion higher than estimated at the 2000-01 Budget. While much of this better than anticipated outcome was due to one-off events or shifts in the timing of revenue, some growth in the ongoing tax base also contributed to the higher outcome (see 1999-2000 Final Budget Outcome for further details).

horizontal line

Previous PageTable Of ContentsNext Page